Comments on: Ruby Currying http://khelll.com/blog/ruby/ruby-currying/ Cool Web Development... Mon, 21 May 2012 00:25:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: curried function http://khelll.com/blog/ruby/ruby-currying/comment-page-1/#comment-8095 curried function Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:34:59 +0000 http://www.khelll.com/blog/?p=401#comment-8095 [...] transforms a function that has multiple arguments into a function which takes less arguments ...Ruby Currying - Khaled alHabache's official blogI would expect the curried' function to have an arity of one. Also, is this currying or ... [...] [...] transforms a function that has multiple arguments into a function which takes less arguments …Ruby Currying – Khaled alHabache's official blogI would expect the curried' function to have an arity of one. Also, is this currying or … [...]

]]> By: 僕の考えたカリー化 « **deadwinter** http://khelll.com/blog/ruby/ruby-currying/comment-page-1/#comment-6476 僕の考えたカリー化 « **deadwinter** Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:21:48 +0000 http://www.khelll.com/blog/?p=401#comment-6476 [...] http://www.khelll.com/blog/ruby/ruby-currying/ Check this function f which takes 3 params x,y,z f(x,y,z) = 4*x+3*y+2*z [...] [...] http://www.khelll.com/blog/ruby/ruby-currying/ Check this function f which takes 3 params x,y,z f(x,y,z) = 4*x+3*y+2*z [...]

]]> By: ara.t.howard http://khelll.com/blog/ruby/ruby-currying/comment-page-1/#comment-2159 ara.t.howard Tue, 26 May 2009 16:37:35 +0000 http://www.khelll.com/blog/?p=401#comment-2159 the arity problem is easy to solve http://drawohara.com/post/113308029/ruby-a-curry-function-for-ruby regards. -a the arity problem is easy to solve

http://drawohara.com/post/113308029/ruby-a-curry-function-for-ruby

regards.

-a

]]> By: Twitted by gnupate http://khelll.com/blog/ruby/ruby-currying/comment-page-1/#comment-2158 Twitted by gnupate Tue, 26 May 2009 16:15:48 +0000 http://www.khelll.com/blog/?p=401#comment-2158 [...] This post was Twitted by gnupate - Real-url.org [...] [...] This post was Twitted by gnupate – Real-url.org [...]

]]> By: khelll http://khelll.com/blog/ruby/ruby-currying/comment-page-1/#comment-2146 khelll Mon, 25 May 2009 22:38:49 +0000 http://www.khelll.com/blog/?p=401#comment-2146 @Reg, as for the arity, i have tried that in Ruby 1.9 and got the same result -1, it's odd though. As for the previous code, you are true, that's a partial function definition, not a currying one. I'll post a better snippet soon. @Reg, as for the arity, i have tried that in Ruby 1.9 and got the same result -1, it’s odd though.

As for the previous code, you are true, that’s a partial function definition, not a currying one. I’ll post a better snippet soon.

]]> By: Reg Braithwaite http://khelll.com/blog/ruby/ruby-currying/comment-page-1/#comment-2144 Reg Braithwaite Mon, 25 May 2009 20:23:41 +0000 http://www.khelll.com/blog/?p=401#comment-2144 The curry definitions given here mess with Proc#arity, don't they? In other words: lambda { |x,y| x + y }.arity => 2 class Proc def curry(*p) lambda {|*args| self.call(*(p+args))} end end lambda { |x,y| x + y }.curry(1).arity => -1 I would expect the 'curried' function to have an arity of one. Also, is this currying or partial application? The curry definitions given here mess with Proc#arity, don’t they? In other words:

lambda { |x,y| x + y }.arity => 2

class Proc
def curry(*p)
lambda {|*args| self.call(*(p+args))}
end
end

lambda { |x,y| x + y }.curry(1).arity => -1

I would expect the ‘curried’ function to have an arity of one. Also, is this currying or partial application?

]]> By: khelll http://khelll.com/blog/ruby/ruby-currying/comment-page-1/#comment-2142 khelll Mon, 25 May 2009 15:42:57 +0000 http://www.khelll.com/blog/?p=401#comment-2142 @Shalev, Thanks, the following one is more enhanced: <pre lang="ruby"> class Proc def curry(*p) lambda {|*args| self.call(*(p+args))} end end </pre> @Shalev, Thanks, the following one is more enhanced:

class Proc
 def curry(*p)
   lambda {|*args| self.call(*(p+args))}
 end
end
]]> By: Shalev http://khelll.com/blog/ruby/ruby-currying/comment-page-1/#comment-2141 Shalev Mon, 25 May 2009 15:06:39 +0000 http://www.khelll.com/blog/?p=401#comment-2141 You can easily do this in Ruby 1.8 with: <code> class Proc def curry(arg) lambda {|*args| self.call(arg,*args)} end end </code> You can easily do this in Ruby 1.8 with:


class Proc
def curry(arg)
lambda {|*args| self.call(arg,*args)}
end
end

]]>